Two Faced Bard Lie

  • Status

    State
    Next Steps
    Case Date
    Jurors Accepted
    Juror Verdicts Finalized

    The details, verdicts, and comments within this case record come from its participants. The Court's role is solely to facilitate the case process.

    Copyright © 2022-2023 Bright Plaza, Inc., All Rights Reserved. No one may publish a case, or any part of it, without a clear reference to the link with the case number as in https://www.truthcourt.net/case/<case-id-number>

  • Details

    Name
    Category
    URL
    Markup
    Lie Truth

     
    Accusation
  • Verdicts

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Bard, when challenged, tells the truth which contradicts the lie. Without apology or explanation.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Bard, when challenged, tells the truth which contradicts the lie. Without apology or explanation.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Bard, when challenged, tells the truth which contradicts the lie. Without apology or explanation.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Bard, when challenged, tells the truth which contradicts the lie. Without apology or explanation.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    There is no explanation for the lie that Bard admits was a lie.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    There is no explanation for the lie that Bard admits was a lie.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    There is no explanation for the lie that Bard admits was a lie. Chat at least makes excuses for itself.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    There is no explanation for the lie that Bard admits was a lie.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Impossible to understand why Bard chose to lie like this.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Impossible to understand why Bard chose to lie like this.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Impossible to understand why Bard chose to lie like this. It's much more clunky that Chat GPT.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    Large language model AIs are as good as the text sources that they are trained on and the quality of their reward processes. With so much misinformation about the Mueller report contained in "official" sources, such as Barr DOJ documents, it is not difficult to imagine how Bard's responses could contain verifiably incorrect information.

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is factually true.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is factually true.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is factually true.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is factually true.
    Answer Confidence: 50 %
    Supporting Text:
    Can they're really be deceit by an AI without a purpose to deceive?

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 65 %
    Supporting Text:
    I prefer to suggest that Bard intended to lie and is acting as if he can be exused if he now admits it...once caught.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 25 %
    Supporting Text:
    Probably ineptitude on the part of the system.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Regurgitating false based on it's statistical occurrences in online sources is not the same as intentional deceit.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to convince you that the lie is factually true.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Pretty sure Bard was ill-motivated. Google to give Bard a sense of ethics and should be more careful on the truth of a first response.

    Answer:
    I'm not sure what the motivation is.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    I'm not sure what the motivation is.
    Answer Confidence: 50 %
    Supporting Text:
    If this is purposeful, Google has an ethics problem.

    Answer:
    I'm not sure what the motivation is.
    Answer Confidence: 85 %
    Supporting Text:
    Does Bard have a motivation to respond with false information? Does Google have an interest in Bard responding with false information? I'm not sure how to investigate either premise.

    Answer: Unacceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    This bodes very poorly for a deceptive lie since Bard is supposed to know it all.

    Answer: Unacceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    This bodes very poorly for a deceptive lie since Bard is supposed to know it all.

    Answer: Unacceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    This bodes very poorly for a deceptive lie since Bard is supposed to know it all.

    Answer: Unacceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    This bodes very poorly for a deceptive lie since Bard is supposed to know it all.

    Answer:
    This is factually untrue.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is factually untrue.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is factually untrue.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Bard needs some work, or Google needs an ethicist.

    Answer:
    This is factually untrue.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Google Bard reiterates false claims that Mueller report exonerated Trump of criminal wrongdoing.