Sneaky Twitter Disinformation about AI

Case 99967E4B-E80F-42BF-941B-080A4855ACBE

  • Status

    State
    Next Steps
    Case Date
    Jurors Accepted
    Juror Verdicts Finalized

    The details, verdicts, and comments within this case record come from its participants. The Court's role is solely to facilitate the case process.

    Copyright © 2022-2024 Bright Plaza, Inc., All Rights Reserved. No one may publish a case, or any part of it, without a clear reference to the link with the case number as in https://www.truthcourt.net/case/<case-id-number>

  • Details

    Name
    Category
    URL
    Markup
    Lie Truth
     
    Accusation

  • Verdicts

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    All editing that is shown would be easy with any decent video editor by an amateur. There is no evidence of AI being employed. Twitter Community notes selected this lie as the explanation of how this video was created...by AI.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    Can't tell if it's an AI edit or not.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    All editing that is shown would be easy with any decent video editor by an amateur. There is no evidence of AI being employed. Twitter Community notes selected this lie as the explanation of how this video was created...by AI.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 80 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth looks like it was a video edited by a person which would be true if it said that based on the original video which does look to be the original video.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Can't tell from this context how it was edited.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth looks like it was a video edited by a person which would be true if it said that based on the original video which does look to be the original video.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Some AI tools could have been employed to create the fake.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    More Twitter/social media nonsense.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is factually true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    If there is a deceit, it is that AI was used.
    Answer Confidence: 20 %
    Supporting Text:
    Seems like it was edited, but how?

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is factually true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Perhaps some AI was involved but to claim it was entirely created by AI is a stretch.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The writer and then Twitter decided that it was OK to say it was AI Edited in order to make people believe that AI did this.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The writer and then Twitter decided that it was OK to say it was AI Edited in order to make people believe that AI did this.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    I suspect the author knew the claim was overstated

    Answer:
    The motivation is to persuade you to hate something or someone.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Hate AI.

    Answer:
    I'm not sure what the motivation is.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    AI is a convenient scapegoat for many things.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to persuade you to hate something or someone.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Hate AI.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to persuade you to hate something or someone.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Hate AI.

    Answer: Unacceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    This is a classic disinformation technique to bury blame where it is not at all justified.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Most users won't know how to detect AI, so this claim is rather meaningless.

    Answer: Unacceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    This is a classic disinformation technique to bury blame where it is not at all justified.

    Answer: Unacceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    This is a classic disinformation technique to bury blame where it is not at all justified.

    Answer:
    This is true, but manipulating.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The video was probably edited but not certainly not by AI.

    Answer:
    This is true, but misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The video was probably edited but not it's not clear how.

    Answer:
    This is true, but manipulating.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The video was probably edited but not certainly not by AI.

    Answer:
    This is true, but manipulating.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Whether some portions of the fake employed is no reason to cast aspersions on all AI