Supreme Hubris

  • Status

    State
    Settled
    Settled
    Next Steps
    Share the case on social media!
    Share the case on social media!
    Case Date
    Wed, Sep 6, 2023, 4:00 PM UTC
    Wed, Sep 6, 2023, 4:00 PM UTC
    Jurors Accepted
    4
    4
    Juror Verdicts Finalized
    4
    4

    The details, verdicts, and comments within this case record come from its participants. The Court's role is solely to facilitate the case process.

    Copyright © 2022-2025 Bright Plaza, Inc., All Rights Reserved. No one may publish a case, or any part of it, without a clear reference to the link with the case number as in https://www.truthcourt.net/case/<case-id-number>

  • Details

    Name
    Supreme Hubris
    Supreme Hubris
    Category
    Disingenuous
    Disingenuous
    Markup
    Lie Truth

     

    “No provision in the Constitution gives them [Congress] the authority to regulate the Supreme Court — period.”


    ~ Samuel Alito, Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court

    “No provision in the Constitution gives them [Congress] the authority to regulate the Supreme Court — period.”


    ~ Samuel Alito, Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court

    Accusation

    In the aftermath of recent disclosures of unreported lavish gifts to members of the US Supreme Court, by individuals with interests in proceedings before the court, and questionable adherence to recusal doctrine, Congress is considering

    In the aftermath of recent disclosures of unreported lavish gifts to members of the US Supreme Court, by individuals with interests in proceedings before the court, and questionable adherence to recusal doctrine, Congress is considering imposing ethical standards on the Court. Some Justices, and their allies outside the Court, claim that Congress has no such authority under the Constitution of the United States.


    I believe that such claims, in particular Justice Samuel Alito's quote from a Wall Street Journal interview, are disingenuous. Throughout American history Congress has asserted a very limited authority over the Court, in keeping with two principles, not explicitly stated on the Constitution but well established, of co-equal branches of government and checks and balances. Congress has never asserted authority over the judicial powers of the Supreme Court, but it has established oaths for justices, financial disclosure requirements and other operational requirements in keeping with good government practice.


    The Brennan Center for Justice details these assertions of Congressional authority over the Supreme Court in the article below:


    https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/congress-has-authority-regulate-supreme-court-ethics-and-duty


    Given the design of the Constitution it seems unlikely that the Founders would have enabled the legislative branch (Congress) to check the power of the Executive by overriding presidential vetoes with a 2/3 majority vote, the Executive branch to check Congressional power by vetoing legislation, the judicial branch (federal courts and Supreme Court) to check the Congress and President by interpreting the Constitution, but that neither of those other branches would have any ability to check the functional authority of the Supreme Court except through impeachment.



  • Verdicts