Elected Official Lie Test

Case 9F1D27B7-D062-4271-B443-4D448A3B3694
Sponsor: Robert Thibadeau

  • Status

    State
    Next Steps
    Case Date
    Watch Video
    Jurors Accepted
    Juror Verdicts Finalized

    The details, verdicts, and comments within this case record come from its participants. The Court's role is solely to facilitate the case process.

    Copyright © 2022-2025 Bright Plaza, Inc., All Rights Reserved. No one may publish a case, or any part of it, without a clear reference to the link with the case number as in https://www.truthcourt.net/case/<case-id-number>

  • Details

    Name
    Category
    URL
    Accusation
    Lie Truth
     
    Argument

  • Verdicts

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    It is true that this law should be passed nationally and by states as required by the US Constitution.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It could work, and it would make people more responsible

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Sounds like a good idea. We do have candidate debates already and they are very flawed since the questions are not penetrating enough.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    If a foolproof test could be produced, this would be awesome.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    You mean like how prospective Presidential appointees are questioned live on television by the Senate after being sworn in under penalty of perjury? They're always truthful and often prosecuted for perjury afterwards, right?

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I feel like it should be a thing since it would keep them more accountable for their actions and tread more carefully so that the don’t spread propaganda and misinformation. It could also make the public trust politicians more, since at the moment, the trust in those who run the country is very low.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    It is true that this law should be passed nationally and by states as required by the US Constitution.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There is detail regarding the exact format of the question answering session which needs to be worked out.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The principle is clear. But how to compress the set of questions which usually occur over the whole course of the candidacy into a single time slot.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There is detail regarding the exact format of the question answering session which needs to be worked out.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    You mean like how prospective Presidential appointees are questioned live on television by the Senate after being sworn in under penalty of perjury? They're always truthful and often prosecuted for perjury afterwards, right?

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The principle is clear. But how to compress the set of questions which usually occur over the whole course of the candidacy into a single time slot.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There is detail regarding the exact format of the question answering session which needs to be worked out.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I think everything in this article is the truth including the need for the law.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    But no candidate would agree to it, and probably nor should they. It is a recipe not for answers but for a correction to the deceits and flaws within each question

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Very interesting hypothesis. Let's see where it leads.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    You mean like how prospective Presidential appointees are questioned live on television by the Senate after being sworn in under penalty of perjury? They're always truthful and often prosecuted for perjury afterwards, right?

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    But no candidate would agree to it, and probably nor should they. It is a recipe not for answers but for a correction to the deceits and flaws within each question

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I think everything in this article is the truth including the need for the law.

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    nope

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    nope

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Deceit not intended.

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    nope

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    nope

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    the truth is intended

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    the truth is intended

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Truth intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    the truth is intended

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Truth is intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    the truth is intended

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    the truth is intended

    Answer:
    The motivation is to convence people to do pass this law.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to persuade you to hate something or someone.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    I'm not sure what the motivation is.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to persuade you to hate something or someone.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I wonder if a better test of sincerity would be to pass a law that does not permit a candidate to do anything he did not say he would do when in office.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to convence people to do pass this law.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    I'm not sure what the motivation is.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to convence people to do pass this law.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to convence people to do pass this law.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I think this is not just a good idea. It is necessary to the survival of democracy in the US and probably other places as well.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    In order to preserve democracy we need sanctions on candidates not questions.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    If a foolproof way to test someone was found it would be acceptable!

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Public officials should absolutely be trustworthy. Unfortunately, the only people who should be in positions of power are the type of people who don't seek positions of power. So instead we're left with people like Ilhan Omar, AOC, and Trump.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I think this is not just a good idea. It is necessary to the survival of democracy in the US and probably other places as well.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I think this is not just a good idea. It is necessary to the survival of democracy in the US and probably other places as well.

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This exposes the problem but is not the solution.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Question and answer gives the illusion of being in control, but useful interrogations usually have to be lengthy and subtle. Will this proposal stand in as a useful interrogation? Don’t know.

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The same politicians that would agree with this premise in public would vote against it in private.

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text: