Fixing Idiocracy 2

Case A013871C-9B94-4B4F-BF77-16803247F455
Sponsor: Robert Thibadeau

  • Status

    State
    Next Steps
    Case Date
    Watch Video
    Jurors Accepted
    Juror Verdicts Finalized

    The details, verdicts, and comments within this case record come from its participants. The Court's role is solely to facilitate the case process.

    Copyright © 2022-2025 Bright Plaza, Inc., All Rights Reserved. No one may publish a case, or any part of it, without a clear reference to the link with the case number as in https://www.truthcourt.net/case/<case-id-number>

  • Details

    Name
    Category
    URL
    Accusation
    Lie Truth
     
    Argument

  • Verdicts

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    But only if Social Media provides truthcourt buttons which anyone can use to question the truth or lie in a post or comment.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Yes, anything that makes people confront liars is a good thing. But with the amount of cheap and easy reach that botnets and misinformation/disinformation networks allow, there has to be a cultural shift towards preferring truth to lies. But modern culture is defined by the same groups that are running disinformation/misinformation campaigns, so ...

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I agree that using truth court to address fiat lies is a great idea.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 50 %
    Supporting Text:
    Wouldn't this be people giving their own opinions in response to the post? Unless each person is made to give sources, which would then give another layer to the original post, checking into the sources.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I googled idocracy to make sure of the definition, thinking of idiots. Idiocracy is a society or government ruled by or consisting of idiots. It can also informally refer to a society where stupidity is the norm, and it is often used in a humorous or derogatory way, sometimes linked to the satirical 2006 movie of the same name. The word is a portmanteau of the Greek roots idiot (from idiōtēs, meaning "private citizen" or "private person") and -cracy (from kratos, meaning "rule" or "power"). Core definition: A society or government composed of foolish, stupid, or ignorant people. Common usage: Often used informally to describe a society where idiocy is considered the norm, sometimes humorously and derogatorily. Etymology: Derived from the Greek idiōtēs ("private person") and kratos ("rule"). Related term: A similar, though distinct, term is idiocrasy, which refers to a peculiarity of constitution or temperament.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Requires a little bit of programming but I can describe the structure.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 80 %
    Supporting Text:
    But only if Social Media provides truthcourt buttons which anyone can use to question the truth or lie in a post or comment.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Allowing of a form of access panel that directs people from which ever social media website to a mini Q & A or comment section can help prevent social media from causing idiocracy

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    With the world moving into a direction of anti-intellectualism and preferring random entertainment instead of content with substance, I feel like something is needed to fix that “idiocracy” issue and what Truth Court is offering could potentially be the solution, my only caveat is what separates this from Twitters community notes?

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The supporting material tells the whole story.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 50 %
    Supporting Text:
    Here's an example of a fiat lie that was immediately disprovable: famine in Gaza. It was never true. It was always a fiat lie, even when that lie was supported by groups like the UN. So why did so many people support a fiat lie? Culture. Can ICOT help change the culture? Of course, but only if it can get traction with online resources. That requires a revamp of the product to make it more palatable by larger groups of people.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 75 %
    Supporting Text:
    In a perfect world, this would be a good idea.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    What prevents the truthcourt system from being universally accepted is that without some training it can appear to be just another set of media opinions.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 75 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The supporting material tells the whole story.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I believe it is the truth and nothing but the truth.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 50 %
    Supporting Text:
    Yes, it's truth, but it requires addressing the deficiencies in the product to make it more palatable to more people.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I agree with the plaintiff

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 50 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I believe it is the truth and nothing but the truth.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 75 %
    Supporting Text:
    I think this must depend to some extent on the impartiality of the jurors. Are they calmly looking to tease out the subtleties of the accusation? Or would volunteering to be a juror attract mainly opinionated hotheads who see on black and white?

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I believe it is the truth and nothing but the truth.

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 65 %
    Supporting Text:
    A lie to one person is not a lie to another. Only in dialogue that we dissect the proposed truth and still just give our opinions. ICOT does help enforce dialogue to explore the truth or lie.

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    It is intended that this is the truth.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    It is intended that this is the truth.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    It is intended that this is the truth.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    It is intended that this is the truth.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    It is intended that this is the truth.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Trying to get people to understand the need for Truth Court in all Social Media.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    This is the perfect motivation, but it requires that the product be more linguistically available to more people.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Trying to get people to understand the need for Truth Court in all Social Media.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Trying to get people to understand the need for Truth Court in all Social Media.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Trying to get people to understand the need for Truth Court in all Social Media.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Getting to a point where people realise that Truth Court or having access to Truth Court in all social media platforms allows for a better chance to understanding what it can provide for them in terms of preventing idiocracy

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Trying to get people to understand the need for Truth Court in all Social Media.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I believe this is a socially acceptable recommendation. People only have to have a button that says they want to bring a post or comment to truth court for their dissection as a plaintiff and optionally for the verdict dissections by others.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Of course it's acceptable. But is it doable? As long as the linguistics remain the same, it's going to be difficult to get any traction for cultural acceptance by a larger audience.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I believe this is a socially acceptable recommendation. People only have to have a button that says they want to bring a post or comment to truth court for their dissection as a plaintiff and optionally for the verdict dissections by others.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 65 %
    Supporting Text:
    In my opinion, this would be great if people had the ability to express only truth in relation to Truth Court responses.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I agree with the plaintiff about the intention. But more work needs to be done to convince the general voice that truthcourt is better than their own narcissistic need to answer with their own unchallenged ideas.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 80 %
    Supporting Text:
    I believe this is a socially acceptable recommendation. People only have to have a button that says they want to bring a post or comment to truth court for their dissection as a plaintiff and optionally for the verdict dissections by others.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I believe this is a socially acceptable recommendation. People only have to have a button that says they want to bring a post or comment to truth court for their dissection as a plaintiff and optionally for the verdict dissections by others.

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    EnForce Dialog to determine what is the truth or what is a lie.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    Get social crédits for being a juror
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Jurors have to be trained just as plaintiffs need to be. Truthcourt is one step up from normal social media involvement.

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 85 %
    Supporting Text:
    I hope this is true, and that there are not lots of people out there who prefer to perpetuate fiat lies and truths, out of laziness or extremism.

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text: