Symmetry of Neural Computation 2

Case A05CAA80-8C4E-43F2-B698-885772A29FAA
Sponsor: Robert Thibadeau

  • Status

    State
    Next Steps
    Case Date
    Watch Video
    Jurors Accepted
    Juror Verdicts Finalized

    The details, verdicts, and comments within this case record come from its participants. The Court's role is solely to facilitate the case process.

    Copyright © 2022-2025 Bright Plaza, Inc., All Rights Reserved. No one may publish a case, or any part of it, without a clear reference to the link with the case number as in https://www.truthcourt.net/case/<case-id-number>

  • Details

    Name
    Category
    URL
    Accusation
    Lie Truth
     
    Argument

  • Verdicts

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    This theory should be testable with modern techniques. I know of no attempts to prove the universality of the claim to living neural systems which would have been infeasible just a few years ago despite the theory having been around for over 50 years.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The brain is an incredible, amazing organ.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Yes, from what I understand.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Problems of motivation. but maybe Sapolsky is right and there is no freely arrived at intentions.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I agree with plaintiff on this very interesting

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Research in brain science supports that neural processing often happens in paired or mirrored ways (left/right brain activity, feedback loops, and pattern matching).

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Processing of neutral in the brain is next level and wil always be a head

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Since even understanding or producing a simple sentence like "The cook threw the knife" involves millions of these symmetric pairings, and a cook actually throwing a knife, millions of other ones overlapping, and even someone ducking from the knife being thrown, millions of overlapping other ones, some real scientific creativity is required to experimentally demonstrate these computations in even one impacted living neural subsystem.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    How our amazing brain works is fascinating. The more I learn the more there is to learn.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    But still where is the final decision, the final choice?

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Since even understanding or producing a simple sentence like "The cook threw the knife" involves millions of these symmetric pairings, and a cook actually throwing a knife, millions of other ones overlapping, and even someone ducking from the knife being thrown, millions of overlapping other ones, some real scientific creativity is required to experimentally demonstrate these computations in even one impacted living neural subsystem.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Since even understanding or producing a simple sentence like "The cook threw the knife" involves millions of these symmetric pairings, and a cook actually throwing a knife, millions of other ones overlapping, and even someone ducking from the knife being thrown, millions of overlapping other ones, some real scientific creativity is required to experimentally demonstrate these computations in even one impacted living neural subsystem.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    That we cannot know for sure at this time.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There is modern research which starts to think of the brain as an entire superpositions of wave forms and that resonances between them all create actions and responses.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The claim focuses on how neural computation pairs recognition — that part is correct and supported by science, without misleading or false elements.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I believe this symmetry claim is true because natural language demonstrates it in order to explain human natural language behaviors and content.

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Deceit is not intended by the Plaintiff.

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    But what precisely is the symmetry being talked about?

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    i see no deceit

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The statement aims to explain, not mislead. It’s based on how the brain naturally organizes thoughts in pairs or mirrored systems.

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I believe this symmetry claim is true because natural language demonstrates it in order to explain human natural language behaviors and content.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Truth intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    truth is intended

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The purpose of the claim is to inform readers about the basic design of neural processes, not to distort or manipulate understanding.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    This should be taken seriously. It predicts a fundamental unit of all neural computation in any animal.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    But I can think of other ways in which outputs can be produce: by reflection or inversions for example.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The author’s goal is to explain brain computation and mental balance in a way that links to cognitive science and understanding of human thought.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    science is always acceptable if it is done well.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    science is always acceptable if it is done well.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It helps people understand how their brains process information and supports education, not harm.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Only if it's for educational purposes

    Answer:
    The claim comes from computational cognitive science.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true according to computational cognitive science.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The claim comes from computational cognitive science.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The claim comes from computational cognitive science.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The claim comes from computational cognitive science.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text: