Stealing Your Agency 2

Case A05CF48E-8342-44CD-B485-9E82796E688D
Sponsor: Robert Thibadeau

  • Status

    State
    Next Steps
    Case Date
    Watch Video
    Jurors Accepted
    Juror Verdicts Finalized

    The details, verdicts, and comments within this case record come from its participants. The Court's role is solely to facilitate the case process.

    Copyright © 2022-2026 Bright Plaza, Inc., All Rights Reserved. No one may publish a case, or any part of it, without a clear reference to the link with the case number as in https://www.truthcourt.net/case/<case-id-number>

  • Details

    Name
    Category
    URL
    Accusation
    Lie Truth
     
    Argument

  • Verdicts

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I believe your agency is a fundamental right. Back when the US Constitution was conceived mass media that could be used to steal your agency was infeasible but the constitution presupposes it. As does the Declaration of Independence. Now that we know it can be stolen, we should have laws against stealing it. In one case against anyone stealing it to benefit a candidate for election or appointment to a government office.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It's another word for lavery

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Agency is a fundamental right presupposed by the U.S. Constitution.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Admittedly, I couldn't read the entire Medium article, but the term "agency" needs to be well-understood and well-defined before any legal treatment should be discussed. If the concept is agency in terms of decision-making autonomy, then I'm completely in agreement. But otherwise, I need to hear more about what "agency" means before I would consider regulating it.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I agree wholeheartedly with the plaintiff here. It should be a fundamental tenet of Human existence that governments go so far and no further. Else it's only power. We had that with the divine right of kings and we are done with it.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 60 %
    Supporting Text:
    We could consider the law to be applied if stipulated in such things as articles of incorporation in companies and organizations regarding employment.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 60 %
    Supporting Text:
    We could consider the law to be applied if stipulated in such things as articles of incorporation in companies and organizations regarding employment.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Too many variables to consider.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    What?

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Is it not the case that individuals have their legal identity? Are new laws necessary?

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I think Wylie's notion of agency theft is extremely clear and easy to understand. Major methods of such theft include character assassination as warned by George Washington in his Farewell Address: Never vote for a divisive liar. This would make divisive lying about people illegal in certain circumstances where oligarchies may form and ultimately dictatorships.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I think Wylie's notion of agency theft is extremely clear and easy to understand. Major methods of such theft include character assassination as warned by George Washington in his Farewell Address: Never vote for a divisive liar. This would make divisive lying about people illegal in certain circumstances where oligarchies may form and ultimately dictatorships.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Major methods of such theft include character assassination as warned by George Washington in his Farewell Address. President Trump does this.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Wouldn't this be called "libel" or "slander"?

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There should be a law against agency theft.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I understand this notion and am still in agreement with the accusation, however, I foresee problems. How do you pin down what exactly a person's agency actually is. Do they not change their minds over time and project different proportions of character during their lifetimes.

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Deceit not intended.

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The proposition is clear in intent. The practicalities of enshrining this in law are difficult.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Truth intended. Getting at the truth intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    I'm not sure what the motivation is.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to protect democratic integrity.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    To establish laws that prevent anyone from stealing agency to benefit candidates for election or government appointments.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to get the hoi polloi to think. Always a bad move.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to convince you that the lie is factually true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The matter, indeed, has some urgency.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    This could fundamentally protect democracies in a fair way in our new world of mass media.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    This could fundamentally protect democracies in a fair way in our new world of mass media.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It has been acceptable.

    Answer: Unacceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I don't like it, but the First Amendment guarantees a right to lie to your customers (and the population at large) without undue governmental impediment. Consider that FOX News successfully defended a defamation lawsuit against Tucker Carlson in 2020 (McDougal vs. Fox News) by successfully claiming that his show couldn't be reasonably taken as a "hard news" program because he was engaging in "non-literal commentary" and "rhetorical hyperbole" rather than stating "actual facts". It's immoral, unethical, and once the iPhone was widely adopted back in 2007, completely unstoppable. Mark Twain once said that it's easier to fool people than to convince them that they've been fooled ... a prescient statement on his part.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    This could fundamentally protect democracies in a fair way in our new world of mass media.

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    I don't know of a good label at this moment
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    Criminal Agency Theft
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    Depending on what is meant by "agency" this line of thought may or may not be valid.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    on the list of critical amendments to every countries constitutions.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text: