Siegel Truth

Case A1105FD6-CE73-4362-B7D2-C1FA4E716C4A
Sponsor: Robert Thibadeau

  • Status

    State
    Next Steps
    Case Date
    Watch Video
    Jurors Accepted
    Juror Verdicts Finalized

    The details, verdicts, and comments within this case record come from its participants. The Court's role is solely to facilitate the case process.

    Copyright © 2022-2026 Bright Plaza, Inc., All Rights Reserved. No one may publish a case, or any part of it, without a clear reference to the link with the case number as in https://www.truthcourt.net/case/<case-id-number>

  • Details

    Name
    Category
    URL
    Accusation
    Lie Truth
     
    Argument

  • Verdicts

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    It is important to distinguish between scientific fact and philosophical interpretation, but with that in mind, yes, this is the truth.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Not sure what the accusation is. But assuming it’s about scale metaphors are lies, I agree. Metaphors have to be related to the Human scale if they are to be j derstood viscerally.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The communication is metaphor...

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    Taking into consideration my first verdict, yes.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Not as framed here but in general yes.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Isn't all discussion of science and/or math merely metaphor and/or analogy? How do we describe concepts (especially to non-physicists) without metaphors and analogies?

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 50 %
    Supporting Text:
    Oddly, nothing is nothing but the truth by the way natural language works with metaphors, analogies, and reality.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 50 %
    Supporting Text:
    Oddly, nothing is nothing but the truth by the way natural language works with metaphors, analogies, and reality.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I agree with plaintiff.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 50 %
    Supporting Text:
    Oddly, nothing is nothing but the truth by the way natural language works with metaphors, analogies, and reality.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    No deceit intended.

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 75 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended. Also Siegel is a great communicator.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Truth in a fun way intended.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Yes. But as for Siegel, yes and no.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended. Also Siegel is a great communicator.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 70 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The goal is comprehension, not metaphysical purity...

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative about how humans have to understand what we can understand.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Cognitive science does support the idea that humans use conceptual blending or metaphors to understand abstract concepts that are outside our evolved sensory experience (like the size of a galaxy).

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative about how humans have to understand what we can understand.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative about how humans have to understand what we can understand.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    I'm not sure what the motivation is.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    I'm not sure what the motivation is.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Science.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    AND a fun way to think about things.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Metaphors need to be studied.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Science.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    Metaphors are not truth. They are like fingers pointing to the Moon.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 70 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text: