25th Amendment First Trial

Case A1647456-BB3A-44BB-91D3-A19085BD6C11
Sponsor: 25th Amendment Trials

  • Status

    State
    Next Steps
    Case Date
    Watch Video
    Jurors Accepted
    Juror Verdicts Finalized

    The details, verdicts, and comments within this case record come from its participants. The Court's role is solely to facilitate the case process.

    Copyright © 2022-2026 Bright Plaza, Inc., All Rights Reserved. No one may publish a case, or any part of it, without a clear reference to the link with the case number as in https://www.truthcourt.net/case/<case-id-number>

  • Details

    Name
    Category
    URL
    Accusation
    Lie Truth
     
    Argument

  • Verdicts

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 80 %
    Supporting Text:
    There are other ways to remove Trump but he should not be allowed any more power in office as soon as possible.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    1. Is it the truth? The accusation is a subjective claim about public belief ("I believe most people believe..."). While it may be "true" that the filer holds this opinion, it is not a legal truth. There is currently no official consensus or movement from the Vice President or Cabinet to execute the amendment.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The 25th Amendment is designed for physical or mental incapacity (like a stroke or coma), not for disagreements over policy, personality, or job performance. Even if I'm worried about his recent choices, I view this trial as an attempt to bypass the standard democratic process or the next election.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    The sources cited by the Plaintiff are erroneous. Although there may be grounds for invoking the 25th, no such grounds were offered by the Plaintiff in this matter.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I do not know if the belief is justified. While Trump’s personal corruption and his traitorous attitude towards Russia demand it, it may well be the case that most people wish to remove the majority in Congress who support him. That is, by the ballot box. The trouble with our forms of leadership and with the way we remove leaders is that they carry away all the sins while the enablers go free.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    If the president is seen to be irrational or unfit to rule, then he should be removed. Trump has proven many times through is words and lies that he is unfit to hold the presidential position.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Trump should be removed from office immediately.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 75 %
    Supporting Text:
    Although I do agree that Donald trump is not fit for leading the USA, the Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution is only meant for presidential incapacity meaning a president is unable to perform the duties of office due to illness or any other problem that might occur.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I await other trials to investigate the details.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    2. Is it the whole truth? No. The claim omits the strict legal requirements of Section 4. The "whole truth" is that the 25th Amendment is a high-bar legal mechanism for incapacity, not a tool for removal based on public opinion or political "reasons."

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    As stated, there are other ways to remove a President than the 25th Amendment. While some "reasons" for concern exist, they don't rise to the level of a constitutional crisis.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    The citations to Iran as grounds for the 25th are completely wrong. The various videos about attacks on Iran demonstrate a huge ignorance on warfare itself as well as whether they should be grounds for invoking the 25th Amendment.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Awaiting other trials doesn’t do justice to this first one.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 80 %
    Supporting Text:
    Trump is a charlatan. He is not honest and has mental issues. A person like that should not be running the most powerful country in the world.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 75 %
    Supporting Text:
    Trump might be removed in some way other than by using the 25th Amendment.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 75 %
    Supporting Text:
    Trump might be removed in some way other than by using the 25th Amendment.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Other trials can investigate what other people might think.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    . Is it nothing but the truth? No. The statement is "polluted" by the word "justify." While someone may feel removal is justified morally or politically, it is not "justified" under the Constitution unless a specific medical or physical inability is proven.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    While I have my concerns about the current direction of the administration, the 25th Amendment was designed for medical or mental 'incapacity,' not for political disagreements or job performance. To say it is 'nothing but the truth' that he should be removed this way ignores the constitutional threshold. The proper way to address a bad job is at the ballot box, not through a cabinet-led removal.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It's not the truth at all based on what's been presented, so it can't be nothing but the truth, either. That doesn't mean that there couldn't be some additional materials but there's nothing presented thus far that qualifies.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    This first trial should lay out the ground work for or at least open the window upon the further examinations.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 80 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    see supporting text
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    4. What is the deceit? The primary deceit is the conflation of popularity with legality. It suggests that if "most people" want a president removed, the 25th Amendment is the correct "immediate action." In reality, the amendment is specifically designed to be insulated from public opinion to prevent political coups.

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is manipulating.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    As a mature woman I’ve seen many presidents, and I know that truth in politics is rarely absolute. While the points raised in the YouTube and X links are troubling, I cannot say with 100% certainty that they meet the high bar of the 25th Amendment. There is too much conflicting information and political noise to label the accusation as 'nothing but' the truth without more objective, non-partisan evidence.

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is manipulating.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    No evidence supporting the premise that the 25th should be invoked has been offered.

    Answer:
    There are too many assumptions to decide what is deceitful here.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There is a fundamental problem with Humans and their ideas of leadership. Removing Trump in this fashion requires all those cabinet and Congress members who supported him to turn against him. Is this likely? Would it not be better to have a proper amendment which specifies mental of physical illness. That way previous supporters can maintain the superficial reality of not betraying their leader and thus make them more willing to do so.

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is manipulating.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    No evidence supporting the premise that the 25th should be invoked has been offered.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    5. Is the deceit or truth intended? This depends on the filer's intent. If they are unaware of constitutional history, it may be an honest mistake. If they are intentionally using "courtroom" language to make a political opinion look like a legal fact, the deceit is intended.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I think the plaintiff probably believes this is 100% truth.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The Plaintiff does not have apparent malicious intent in their phrasing. But there's nothing factual underpinning the premise that the 25th should be invoked.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The motivation of the plaintiff is not established. But the meaning of the sentence is clear enough.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Depends on the intention of the plaintiff. I do think the truth is intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to give a large number of other people a voice that can be heard.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    6. What is the motivation? The Sponsor likely aims to build political pressure or test how acceptable the idea of removal is to the public. The motivation is advocacy/activism rather than a neutral legal inquiry.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to persuade you to hate something or someone.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Definitely.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to persuade you to hate something or someone.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I mean ... let's be honest ... this is an appeal to TDS as a premise to remove him as President. Could there be other material that might be sufficient to invoke the 25th? Sure, but there's none here.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to persuade you to hate something or someone.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The plaintiff is maintaining distance from the truth of the accusation, commenting only on what the majority of people may want without proof. Trump’s standing in the polls is low but that does not necessarily agree with using the amendment to get rid of him.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to get agreement that Trump must be removed from the presidency.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to halt the escalating chaos created by Trump, a goal desired by Democrats and an increasing number of disillusioned Republicans.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to persuade you to hate something or someone.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The plaintiff is maintaining distance from the truth of the accusation, commenting only on what the majority of people may want without proof. Trump’s standing in the polls is low but that does not necessarily agree with using the amendment to get rid of him.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It is wholly acceptable to get the beliefs of other people with their justifications.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    7. What is the social acceptability? This is a "high-conflict" topic. While it is socially acceptable to debate a president's fitness, it can be seen as socially harmful to misrepresent the Constitution, as it creates confusion about how the government actually functions.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 50 %
    Supporting Text:
    Here is what Gemini tells me about his latest approval ratings: The UMass Amherst poll of 33% is noted as the lowest of his second term. This reflects the "bad job" sentiment you mentioned earlier, particularly regarding the war in Iran and rising costs of living. Base Loyalty: While his overall numbers are down, his support among Republicans remains relatively high but is showing cracks. Pew Research reported in late January that Republican approval was at 73%, which is a slight dip from previous months. 2024 Voter Reservations: Interestingly, about 17% of 2024 Trump voters now express reservations about their choice, which aligns with your own feelings of uncertainty. Issue-Specific Disapproval: His lowest marks are currently on inflation (24% approval) and his handling of Iran (roughly 35% approval).

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It just depends on the audience. When presented to people afflicted with TDS, they love this. When presented to people who aren't afflicted with TDS, they're more contemplative about this.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    We have here belief upon belief which is not satisfactory. The proposition is one removed from acceptability.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    This has to be acceptable. It's an opinion that must be respected.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    Many trials on the subject.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    see supporting text
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    8. What label would improve it? The statement would be more socially acceptable and "truthful" if labeled as "Political Opinion" or "Public Sentiment Poll" rather than a "Trial" regarding the "Execution" of a Constitutional Amendment.

    Answer:
    More trials on this topic with varying points of view.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is factually untrue.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    That's the appropriate label considering the evidence presented.

    Answer:
    Further refinement of the truth is required
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    More accurate would be asking directly, would people like to see Trump impeached this way.

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The more trials we do on this subject, the clearer it will be whether most people support using the 25th Amendment to oust Trump.

    Answer:
    This is factually untrue.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There are no concrete evidence that can prove that your case is indeed true.