Weissmann Book

Case A1F7F278-F3F8-4EB5-B1C6-591C28763366
Sponsor: Robert Thibadeau

  • Status

    State
    Next Steps
    Case Date
    Watch Video
    Jurors Accepted
    Juror Verdicts Finalized

    The details, verdicts, and comments within this case record come from its participants. The Court's role is solely to facilitate the case process.

    Copyright © 2022-2026 Bright Plaza, Inc., All Rights Reserved. No one may publish a case, or any part of it, without a clear reference to the link with the case number as in https://www.truthcourt.net/case/<case-id-number>

  • Details

    Name
    Category
    URL
    Accusation
    Lie Truth
     
    Argument

  • Verdicts

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    Human lying is truly at fault in the loss of our democracy.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I agree with Bobs accusation. Will wait for more information during the trial.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 80 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Weissman's first recommendation will lose on First Amendment grounds. The other two are excellent recommendations.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Failure to challenge is the principal,fault. To give in to a lie because it does not represent truth and therefore is of less importance than truth is the big mistake.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    When political leaders deliberately spread false information, they deepen social divisions, weaken trust in democratic institutions, and make it more difficult for citizens to make informed decisions.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Brazen political lying is one of the reasons at the heart of the collapse of US Democracy. It's not the only reason.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I am not sure, but it is one of the greatest contributors to all that is wrong with this world.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Weissman's first recommendation will lose on First Amendment grounds. The other two are excellent recommendations.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Democracy requires courage and a forum. Deny both and lying can dominate. It’s a partnership. Not simply lying on its own.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Like I said in my previous answer, brazen political lying is not the only reason for the collapse of democracy.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Weissman's first recommendation will lose on First Amendment grounds. His other two are excellent recommendations.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    Cherry picking.
    Answer Confidence: 60 %
    Supporting Text:
    Simpler Approach: Thibadeau suggests his own proposal is more transparent: requiring candidates to participate in a live, one-hour, televised question-and-answer session. Under this proposal, any proven lie would constitute perjury, leading to immediate disqualification from candidacy. (While this would be excellent who fact checks the fact checkers?)

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There are no indicia that the Plaintiff is attempting to be deceitful.

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is manipulating.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Other forces are at work.

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to convince you that the lie is factually true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to convince you that the lie is factually true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It is a bit of misdirection since often what is true is. It known with certainty.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It is essential that this message get out and the law be adjusted to keep the brazen divisive political lies under control.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    It's acceptable but it must be qualified that this is one of the major reason (of many) that cause the fall of democracy.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 60 %
    Supporting Text:
    Probably about 60/40.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Agreed, but I just wish that it could be extended internationally. I'm SO TIRED of Al Jazeera and other Islamist entities pushing directly anti-Western narratives that Westerners fall for because they hit the right emotional triggers.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The systems are in p,ace but just not being used.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true, but misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Lies need a stress test, that everyone can employ against the supporters of the lies.

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    Think for yourself!
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true, but misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Lies need a stress test, that everyone can employ against the supporters of the lies.

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text: