Trumper

Case A28E63F3-8FAB-43B4-A0D3-5AABD53D175E
Sponsor: Robert Thibadeau

  • Status

    State
    Next Steps
    Case Date
    Watch Video
    Jurors Accepted
    Juror Verdicts Finalized

    The details, verdicts, and comments within this case record come from its participants. The Court's role is solely to facilitate the case process.

    Copyright © 2022-2026 Bright Plaza, Inc., All Rights Reserved. No one may publish a case, or any part of it, without a clear reference to the link with the case number as in https://www.truthcourt.net/case/<case-id-number>

  • Details

    Name
    Category
    URL
    Accusation
    Lie Truth
     
    Argument

  • Verdicts

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    This is an amazing use of an LLM (Grok) to demonstrate any sentence can be a truth or lie by contextual predication as predicted by Perceptron Theory.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Yes, but it's just demonstrating a truism. If we define the sun as a giant ice cream cone, then it becomes a truth that a giant ice cream cone rises in the east every morning.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Makes sense.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 70 %
    Supporting Text:
    It depends on the context of what Bob is trying to explain.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It seems s to me that it is more truthful to say that any context can be conceived of to turn the sentence into a truth or a lie. Thus it depends upon what contexts the receiver holds onto or believes that can determine how the sentence is interpreted. This is not the same thing as determining the truth or lie of the sentence. It is also interesting that Grok did not actually find the right answer, which was that the sentence contained a misspelling and did not intend the word Trumper at all.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    This is an amazing use of an LLM (Grok) to demonstrate any sentence can be a truth or lie by contextual predication as predicted by Perceptron Theory.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There are some steps that would need to be taken for a formal proof.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There are some steps that would need to be taken for a formal proof.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    If appropriate steps are taken beforehand, yes.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There are some steps that would need to be taken for a formal proof.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There are some steps that would need to be taken for a formal proof.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There are some steps that would need to be taken for a formal proof.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Depends on the prior two answers.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    Really not sure?

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    As mentioned, this needs to be rephrased to encompass what people accept and adopt as opposed to what people know about the truth or lie.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is manipulating.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It is the context which misleads.

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Truth intended by author.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I’m pretty sure the truth was intended but I might be being manipulated.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    To educate.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Unless it’s to mislead.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I believe that this is an important aspect of any human natural language sentence that illustrates the fundamental neuronal computation as a predication that we can observe directly in natural language. It is a survival property so an animal can both perceive the truth and a deception...in the same thing in different contexts.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It's not that complicated. We define things commonly so that we can understand each other when we communicate.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    As mentioned, context only satisfies the believers sense of truth and does not assist in evolutionary terms the speaker. If what I say is always ambivalent then no meaning can be assured.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I believe that this is an important aspect of any human natural language sentence that illustrates the fundamental neuronal computation as a predication that we can observe directly in natural language. It is a survival property so an animal can both perceive the truth and a deception...in the same thing in different contexts.

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true, but misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Lies are unfinished consciousness. No one willingly says something in order that its truth relies upon an individual’s unknown contexts. One speaks to know contexts and common acceptances. Language means that individual conscious contexts are sandboxed and do not disturb the common ground too much.

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text: