AI Presidents

Case A2A29737-9EA8-43A6-8F93-5DE3241B1E33
Sponsor: Robert Thibadeau

  • Status

    State
    Next Steps
    Case Date
    Watch Video
    Jurors Accepted
    Juror Verdicts Finalized

    The details, verdicts, and comments within this case record come from its participants. The Court's role is solely to facilitate the case process.

    Copyright © 2022-2026 Bright Plaza, Inc., All Rights Reserved. No one may publish a case, or any part of it, without a clear reference to the link with the case number as in https://www.truthcourt.net/case/<case-id-number>

  • Details

    Name
    Category
    URL
    Accusation
    Lie Truth
     
    Argument

  • Verdicts

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    This is a Disney animation twist on the dangers of modern AI.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    We have to keep humans in the loop and as the final gate before AI makes any kind of decisions that impact human society.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    There must always be a real human at the helm.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    There's one word that underlies everything about this article: accountability. That's what ICOT offers that no AI service does.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    This is a Disney animation twist on the dangers of modern AI.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I am not sure what the Disney twist is.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I don't doubt that AI is dangerous.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    AI may make the decision, but humans design it, deploy it and choose how it is used.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It very simply tells you about the future without human responsibility for AI use.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I don't know enough about what the real impact of letting AI make independent decisions will have on society.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    We must remain responsible for Ai's actions 100% if we don't want to end up being the slave of AI.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    The transition from online to meatspace is the biggest gap to breach. But an AI that can autonomously trade online can also accumulate wealth sufficient to create its own business and then have additional real-world impacts. This is absolutely viable.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It very simply tells you about the future without human responsibility for AI use.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    If you mean by mixing simulated worlds with real worlds then the human responsibility factor becomes even less capable of changing anything.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    AI becomes dangerous when humans use it irresponsibly, so the people who create, deploy, or operate AI should be personally accountable for the consequences of its use.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There are dozens of other scenarios as well. But all reach the same conclusion.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I'll decide when Bob presents his case.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I believe in this case it is.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There are dozens of other scenarios as well. But all reach the same conclusion.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Do they?

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Holding humans responsible for what AI does does not make AI safe. There are many dangerous humans.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There doesn't seem to be any deceit, but I'm not sure.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Just like a patient cannot give informed consent to a complicated medical procedure, Humans are in no position to take full responsibility away from the makers and the law makers.

    Answer:
    The deceit is that this implies that by holding humans responsible for AI, AI will somehow be safer.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I think the plaintiff honestly believes that AI will be less dangerous of Humans are held legally responsible for what it does.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    I'm not sure what the motivation is.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    To educate and warn us.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    I'm not sure what the motivation is.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to make you like someone.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I think the motivation is to assuage fears about AI.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Hopefully this will help get the word out about why AI technologists and scientists are concerned about free ranging AI in human society.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Hopefully this will help get the word out about why AI technologists and scientists are concerned about free ranging AI in human society.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Hopefully this will help get the word out about why AI technologists and scientists are concerned about free ranging AI in human society.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The arguments do need to be made.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It's clearly better that humans be held responsible for AI than to have AI on an uncontrolled and unpunishable rampage.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    Buyer BEWARE.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    Essential content here. Open with care.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    Holding humans responsible for AI might somewhat lessen the danger of AI, depending on the moral qualities of those humans.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text: